2204140300Th DNA AND THE PARETO PRINCIPLE AS REFLECTED BY THE 80/20 SMV (Sexual Marketplace Value) AND HUMAN PRODUCTIVITY BOTH PROVE THE MODIFIED HUMAN HISTORY OF FEMINIST THEORY TO BE PURE FEMALE PROJECTION OF THEIR OWN HISTORICAL MISANDRY (male hatred)?

The history of the human race, unlike feminists’ concocted history, is one of cruel misandry (male hatred) rather than misogyny (female hatred)! Evidence such as DNA proving that only 40% of men that have ever lived reproduced while it is a logical certainty that 100% of capable females have.

There is a conspicuous void where the work of a female anthropologist fifty or so years ago should appear prominently? It’s easy to understand why feminists had to silence her work, The book she wrote detailed the history of humanity while still cave dwellers. Her research convinced her that female humans would live safely within caves with the children they bore all the while denying the male humans knowledge as to which child or children were theirs – demanding they hunt and bring back to their cave sustenance they’d risked their lives to acquire never to know if they’d risked their live in support of their offspring(s) or not? To this very day feminism will fight to keep that information from fathers – keep men in servitude to them as it were?

Doesn’t the futility of trying to apply the Pareto Principle to human productivity in itself disprove the feminist’s insistence on equality of the sexes (genders) by showing that men and women aren’t even the same sex (gender)? Apples are not oranges anymore than women are men – nor are any of the afore mentioned interchangeable as has always been the dream of (feminist) socialism?

While it would be a nice thing if productivity could be directly connected to wages earned accomplishing it -- but that will always just be a pipe dream? Capitalism solves this problem by making wages earned simply being what the free market will bear for the subject production? In short, the end product is what carries the weight of all the wages paid in the production of said finished product – including all of the air conditioned set down paper shuffling jobs? Application of the pareto principle will tell you how many employees actually produced that most important end product?

Since the pareto principle is applicable to literally everything – literally everything. Why not use it to better understand the 80/20 SMV (Sexual Marketplace Value) & HUMAN PRODUCTIVITY as a whole? What I’m saying is that a degree of some sort may, or may not, be an indicator of prospective earnings – but it’s just that, prospective, not fact? It’s Human Productivity that actually counts – is it not? Or look at it this way, who does the massive lions share of productivity considering that productivity isn’t directly connected to wages earned? Put another way, women are (just plain) crazy and men are (just plain) stupid?

Can you think of a single thing a woman can do, other than birth a baby, that a man can’t do? The very idea that we even consider an 80/20 Rule as relevant to female mate selection completely obliterates the whole sick notion of historic female oppression – does it not?

The clock of fear is ticking on feminism’s clock. Education isn’t what will ever position female humans in a supremacist position in life – they need that extra education just to try making themselves worth of mankind's attention? Can the relative positioning between man and woman be any clearer than that set out at Genesis 3: 16 – I DON’T THINK SO?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Genesis 3:16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
DISCLAIMER: Nothing in this post is intended promote anything approaching reconciliation of the sexes as men’s rights do – and unfortunately Joker tends to do as well. MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) isn’t about even concerning ones self with reconciliation – not in the least. Please do correct any part of this post that might give you that wrong impression of attempting reconciliation, thanks ahead of time? I had one commentator recently that stated that my posts were divisive – he was right and ever may that be so?

#LETSGOBRANDON
#MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) an individualist philosophy of life – consider it?

Posted by: Better Bachelor ~ Jul 24, 2021
“Part two of a two part series special, looking at the forgotten men in dating”