Question

This video made the rounds post November 3, then vanished, lost in the morass of political posturing and leftist propaganda. That’s too bad, considering their unending exhortations to “follow the science.” Of course, science on the left is only valid when it affirms leftist talking points.

Real science has no opinion; it certainly conforms to no ideology (that’s the realm of religion.) This video introduces the Data Integrity Group a collection of cross-discipline specialists in the analysis of data.

The beautiful thing about data is that it can’t be disputed; it simply exists. In the case of the election, the data is publicly available, from no less a leftist source than The New York Times. Data has no agenda, it is linked to no political ideology, and has nothing to do with midnight deliveries, fraudulent ballots, “baseless claims,” or conspiracies. It’s an immutable record of results.

The question: do the results make sense? The mainstream narrative, that Biden won fair and square, implies that the results would conform to long-recognized patterns. This is not opinion, it is academically recognized science. Anomalous results demand an explanation, and the explanations offered run afoul of the laws of probability and chance. In short, we are asked to believe that Biden beat the house odds by margins that are simply impossible.

It’s science: the science of statistics and probability, about which the vast majority of voters are woefully ignorant. That’s why casinos make money and gamblers lose. The house always wins. You never beat the odds—not over the long haul.

The only reason someone would dispute this analysis is either a criminal level of stupidity, or criminal level of corruption.

#propaganda #religion #NewYork #reason #video #biden #money #laws

Edgework 8

Answer 1

If you believe the 2020 election WAS NOT fixed, you are an idiot, stupid, or a leftist!!!!
Any questions?????

Answer 2

See! Toldya! The numbers don't add up. The house always wins. Conclusion: Math is racist.

Answer 3

Howdy @Edgework,

That's what made me so suspicious about the 2020 election. I've watched and read about elections since the 1960s. The side with no energy, no enthusiasm, fumbling messaging always loses; except for the most banal, uninspiring politician I've ever seen? And that doesn't even start with the statistical anomolies.

Amen, brother.

Answer 4

🗣Don't forget that objectivity is white supremist!


Author	Author:
Type of abuse	I think this violates the community guidelines. Chat or rant, adult content, spam, insulting other members I think this is illegal. Harm to minors, violence or threats, harassment or privacy invasion, impersonation or misrepresentation, fraud or phishing, etc.
Additional Details If Needed

Chat room is open

Post a comment Author doesn't reply Reply Author doesn't reply Add Photo

Be part of the movement!

4 comments

Recent Visitors 18

Photos 11,795 More

Members 9,402Top

Moderators

Related GroupsMore