21.07.28.0530W WHAT DOES “WERE HAVE ALL THE GOOD MEN GONE” ACTUALLY MEAN IN FEMALE ILLOGICAL BABBLE?

The great TFM (Turd Flinging Monkey) once created an excellent video by the title of: “She’ll Never Love You” - which I can’t give enough kudos. Whether or not this post corresponds perfectly with the subject hypothesis within this post really doesn’t matter to me as this post is only putting forth one hypothesis – of which there could many, but this one is mine.

Contrary to feminist dogma, men (in general of course) do not conscienceless or subconsciously see wife and/or children as possessions in spite of feminist theory projection. BUT women do see, whether it be conscienceless or subconsciously, husbands & children as their personal possessions.

For verification just notice which sex immediately upon consummation of a business contract that we call a marriage assumes possession of all property previously owned by the other party instantly – AND I DO MEAN INSTANTLY?

This paradox of marriage becomes clear if you take into account that there are several different forms of love for which the English language limits us to just the one word - love. If you could breed a hybrid between a guard dog & mule you’d have a creature that matched how women subconsciously view men neither of which mean anything more than something she owns?

Mules & dogs have no human rights, so why then should men have them? Women love men the same way that men may love their automobile – as their property.

Children represent property that selfishly belongs to a woman & her’s alone because it came out of her body therefore contains part of her physical body. That’s why women are so disposed to aborting a pregnancy – it’s her’s alone. On the other side of that self same coin, should they so choose, they’ll fight to the death to protect that child that she considers her property.

The avarice of woman knows no limits. That’s how the snake was so able to get Eve to violate GOD’s command – she wanted to be powerful like GOD.

However, from the lips of GOD came forth an edict specific to man at: Genesis 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh. (kjv) Conversely I know of no such edict that a woman would reciprocate by becoming one flesh with man – do you?

My hypothesis is that man love forms a chain to woman that doesn’t exist for women to be bound or contained by? She feels free to discard men like a man would take his automobile to a junk yard after it had outlived its usefulness – callous as this hypothesis may be it plays out in family courts every day.

I’d further hypothesize that subconsciously women inherently know this chain of love exists for men & not them. No-Fault divorce & marital rape laws don’t take this element into account leaving men completely defenseless with nothing to restrain women.

#MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) evasive philosophy of life for Men is the only response to female tyranny left to Man. It not a hate movement nor is it a retaliation of any kind – it’s a self defense philosophy of life for Men that is provided for by 1 Corinthians Chapter 7 – ALL 40 VERSES.

PS. 80% of all divorces are filed by women & men get custody of their children less than 10% of the time – and gentlemen you lose the property settlement as well. Gentlemen, the best you can do is just not say “I Do” to anything in the first place & consider #MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) individualist philosophy of life for yourself not making your situation worse.

WHAT WOMEN ACTUALLY MEAN WHEN THEY ASK WHERE HAVE ALL THE GOOD MEN GONE - IS WHERE HAVE ALL THE MEN NOT YET FEMINIZED TO BE AS CALLOUS AS WOMEN HAVE GONE.

Posted by: Fleetwood Mac ~ Sep 27, 2018
“Fleetwood Mac - The Chain (Official Music Video)”