21.07.17.1940Sa MASCULINITY IS CREATIVE/PRODUCTIVITY:

As with a great many words, leftists (regardless of the moniker they present) have the affinity for sophistry by changing the meaning of words – such as the meaning of the word ‘creativity.’ I don’t know nor care when it was changed, I just know it was changed. Changed with the obvious motivation of misandry by slighting the masculine attribute of creativity. Therefore I herein above have changed the way I address masculine creativity to ‘creative/productivity’ in the style of their marxist/socialism. They know full well that no human being creates anything by their definition – only GOD can create something from nothing. It’s just another slur on man attempting to lower male status rather than lift their status up – a all too common expression of bigotry.

The controversy between female & male, socialism & individualism is the self same controversial dilemma that exists between those that don’t create/produce & those that can create/produce. It’s the same as expressed by the socialist (communism) descriptive slogan popularized by Karl Marx:

"From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" 

Apart from the obvious, the pronoun stands out concerning who is to be creative/producing & who is to be receiving same. Her or not even they is mentioned as producing or receiving such produced – why is that do you think? Surely Uncle Karl would’ve gotten his pronouns correct – wouldn’t he?

Never in the history of the world, under any condition, have women been the net creative/producers – never!

When they (leftist of any moniker) assess the human condition they’ve always meant that men create/produce while women take & destroy. That’s not being misogynist – that’s just fact.

Why else do you think that China’s one child policy resulted in massively more males than females – it’s always the males that have created/produced for those incapable of creating/producing for themselves.

Communist socialism can’t work, in the eventuality, because someone has to create/produce for civilization to viably exist – just fact absent feminist delusion(s). No matter how much leftist feminism hates heterosexual males they can’t do without them – least they never have?

#MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) is an individualist philosophy of life complete void of misogyny contrary to what anyone may think. Oh, for sure there are an abundance of rightfully disgruntled men laudably going monk as it’s referred to. But why should that be of concern when college professors openly ask: “Why can’t we hate men?” The answer is YES, just do it on your own dime, that’s all MGTOW exhorts – nothing complicated or misogynist about that is there?

To adopt a phrase from feminism why can’t Men simply say: “My body, My choice?”

The ignorance of feminism is absolutely astounding with a slogans like: “The personal is political.” Or don’t you see the contrast between personal & political?

Virtually everything about feminism devolves or evolves to sex & reproduction – depending on your point of view? The Chinese historically drowned their daughters because they represented dead weight – there was nothing misogynist about it. But mess with nature & nature is going to mess with you – fact, not fiction!
Or look at it this way, humanity is only renting this earth – any major alteration needs to be approved by the landlord & he’s not taking calls from socialists right now – thinking of climate hysteria at the moment, but there’s no exclusive entitlement held by women on men – none!

The dichotomy facing humanity in all aspects is between those that create/produce & those that don’t – that’s it simply said. Feminist women have all the personal freedom imaginable, yet they also want political equality when they don’t earn it in the least – strange? Neither of which obligate Men or entitle women to them – or am I wrong some way?

PS. Frankly women, MGTOW don’t give a damn.

Posted by: SLAP BANG ~ Nov 13, 2019
“Entitled White Women’s Tears | Commercia”