o'biden has labeled two distinct threats to the nation – ‘white supremacists’ and ‘anti-government extremists.’ He stated, “Domestic terrorism – driven by hate, bigotry, and other forms of extremism— is a stain on the soul of America,”

Part of his strategy to combat ‘domestic terrorism’ in the United States, will include training for retired service members to avoid radicalization and seeks to root out “insider threats” in the military.

[thepoliticalinsider.com]

The most dangerous people in America continue to exist. That is the greatest threat to terror in America: domestic terror.”

O'biden alledges there are certain groups of people helping white supremacy spread in America. No mention of antifa or blm rioting and violence.

O'biden says he only got involved in politics to begin with because of civil rights and opposition to white supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan which is a lie considering he opposed bussing during desegregation among other things. Here's an article on o'biden and his forgotten racial issues history

.[nymag.com]

“You see what’s happening — and the studies that are beginning to be done … about the impact of former military, former police officers, on the growth of white supremacy in some of these groups." Again only white persons are identified as potential domestic terrorists or their supporters.*

Why are o'biden and the primarily white progressives targeting the white US population? Is this blanket targeting of whites the only way they can legitimize targeting their political opponents by labeling them anti-establishment extremists?

Did you know o'biden has joined the Christchurch Call which was spearheaded by SJW New Zealand PM Jacinda Arden and is a commitment by Governments and big-tech companies to eliminate terrorist and violent extremist content online? This group says they rest on the conviction that a free, open and secure internet offers extraordinary benefits to society. They say that respect for freedom of expression is fundamental. However, no one has the right to create and share terrorist and violent extremist content online. Who will define what speech and content meets their criteria? Also note thar facebook, twitter, google, etc. are partners in this group so what could go wrong given their history of censorship in internet marketplace?

[christchurchcall.com]

The NDAA allows US citizens to be detained indefinitely without being charged or any due process under the law if they are labeled terrorists . Will any white that doesn't support the current administration or speaks out against it and/or CRT fear arrest and possible detention whether in the military or a civilian?

Insanity has become a reality.