21.05.15.0809Sa PURE MISANDRY! But women can’t seem to recognize it in themselves. Consider how male & female police officer carefully interact with female suspects; as opposed to how this female police officer interacts with this male backseat passenger who expressed a perfectly reasonable medical concern for himself about the lights being flashed on him.
Now if you heard this man make a threat or even pose a threat at any time, you sure have better hearing than I do, The man informed her that he had epilepsy that the lights on him were affecting. It is noteworthy that this female officer made it clear that she recognized the man’s medical issue with the lights on him when she forced him to set on the ground BEFORE HE HAD A SEIZURE.
This man, a backseat passenger, who she verbally stated was being cooperative, she none-the-less handcuffed flaunting her authority needlessly instead of arresting the female suspect driver.
This is why no woman should hold authority over any man be it government, employment or law enforcement – they have no since of justice in them.
BUT HERE”S THE QUESTION: Why in the world didn’t she immediately arrest this female suspect never mind towing the vehicle. She’d (the female suspect) already admitted to multiple crimes that a man would’ve been arrested for on the spot?
PS. When this female officer stated that: “Your not under arrest but you can’t go.” This man’s Constitution human rights take center stage all in that one statement. Women just refuse to acknowledge they’re not an abused class – they’re a super privileged class!
Young Men, consider #MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) individualist philosophy of life & never say “I Do” to anything.
Posted by: A&E ~ Sep 28, 2018
“Live PD: Is Something Missing? (Season 2) | A&E”
When your dealing with something that is often as primal as law enforcement sex is unfortunately a factor. If you look at behavior in teens that have not been fully socialized they behave in typical primate social patterns. Males gain social status through sports or intelligent leadership. Leadership that involves risk taking such as edgy humor to physical stunts and domination. Females gain leadership through sexual attractiveness, threats of social alienation, signs of inherited social status in dress and mannerisms, and male attention. While both sexes ultimately gain social status through networking police are dealing with people outside their social network. When dealing with strangers males because of how they gain social status have an advantage. It's easier for them to immediately establish dominance.
Instincts by definition are immutable and subconscious. They can be controlled but not altered. No amount of socialization will change the way people feel when confronted by a stranger.
Females may make good detectives or fighter pilots but being a patrol officer or Navy Seal will be an uphill struggle. Social engineering has limitations.
I don’t believe women should be cops in the first place because they simply don’t have the physical strength or the physical presence that commands respect the way most male cops have. I’ve watched countless bodycam videos of female cops trying to arrest male and female subjects who simply don’t take them seriously and resist which then, more often than not, forces the female cops to resort to lethal force.
In my professional opinion, the way this officer handled this stop should have got her ass kicked, at a minimum!!!
I have made 1000's of stops, and trained many new officers on proper procedures!!!
I won't go into the lengthy list of things she did wrong!!!
Thank God the camera crew was there, this could have turned deadly quickly!!!!
I saw absolutely nothing the officer did wrong. Those in the car started off doing fine also, but when they chose to become more combative with a single (one) police officer they were asking her to make her own safety more of an issue. Of course it would be a different issue if they were driving on their own property. (Thank you for showing a more common example of police interaction that had no focus on the color of anybody’s skin)
Like most liberals, these people seem to think they are victims when they are called out for flouting the law/regulations. (I haven’t done anything wrong and it’s not my fault that I have several tickets and warnings to stop doing this. The cops keep giving me tickets fir doing the same thing again and again over the past couple of years, so it’s their fault that I owe so much money and it’s their fault that I won’t be able to get to work if they enforce the laws/regulations.) It’s not a violent crime, but when we choose to refuse to obey laws and regulations, be they just or unjust, we should expect to pay the price (choices have ramifications).
The same principle goes for people like me when tyrants make owning a personal weapon or not wearing a mask nor getting vaccinated a crime. Since I will practice civil disobedience, I will need to be prepared to pay the price. (All the way up to giving my life for my beliefs.) When they persecute, imprisonments and kill enough of us, some of the go-along-to-get-along people will finally see the danger of government over-reach and will join the fight to overthrow the tyrants. If enough of us are willing to refuse to obey unjust laws it will either cause the tyrants to change their minds about outlawing our God given rights, or it will cause a civil war and the overthrow of the tyrants (remember the Boston tea party and the war America fought for independence from a distant tyrannical government?).
This is the principle of balancing personal God-given rights and personal responsibilities toward others within a society based upon agreed upon laws/regulations. This principle should always be considered, not only when the cause matters/applies to us.
In my experience, the women I've spoken with overwhelmingly say they'd rather work for a male boss than a female boss.
Why? Well, to hear them tell it, a male boss is more likely to treat them fairly - and even if he is a jerk - he's at least consistent. In other words, no surprises, no emotional outbursts, no cattiness, no walking on eggshells. Again, this is women telling me this. And in my personal experiences with female bosses, I absolutely agree with them.
In my observation, women who are in positions of authority - particularly positions that are historically male-dominated - seem to have this chip on their shoulder that makes them think that everyone is questioning their right to have that authority, whether anyone really is or not. As such they act with this...I can only characterize it as anger...to anything that even appears to question that authority, because it's taken as a personal attack. I can have disagreeable conversations with male authority figures and nothing comes of it; but it seems every time I disagree with a female authority, even if I'm being very careful to choose my language to avoid making it appear personal...it invariable gets interpreted as personal, and becomes an emotionally charged conversation.
If I'd only experienced this once or twice, I might consider that to be the person, but I swear - my hand to God - I experience this with damn near EVERY woman in a position of authority except one: homemaker/mother. That seems to be the one position of authority that women are perfectly comfortable and confident in their authority and don't see challenges to it as a personal attack.
And no, I'm not trying to suggest that women lack the ability to lead or manage people, because they absolutely can. What I'm suggesting is that - based on my experience and observations - women in authority lack confidence and comfort in their authority (with the one noted exception), and that causes them to act with volatility that makes everyone else uncomfortable.
And no, I don't think that's a product of misogyny, because again, it doesn't matter how supportive you are or how carefully you choose your language when speaking with them. Nor does the behavior change if it's a woman dealing with another woman in authority. If anything, I'd call it lack of coaching, because mentors have learned that too many women simply do not want to be coached, again, because they take any suggestion of correction as a personal attack.