Yes, hypocrisy is the prime concept. You can defeat most Democrat arguments just by holding up
the hypocrisy mirror.

Shaolin Abbot to Bruce Lee: You must remember that the enemy has only images and illusions behind which he hides his true motives. Destroy the image and you will break the enemy.

Putting aside the question of if the protests are legit or not, it doesn't even matter. What matters is,

Democrats want to bluff and hold the illusion that they have moral superiority, but they wantonly encouraged violence against Trump supporters, and never condemned it. They rush to slander any Trump gathering of any kind, in support of the bluff.They want you to believe that they hold the moral superiority card. They do not possess this card. See their bluff and raise them back. Make them go down double.

Joe Biden can't even read a tele-prompter ....

Biden Misreads Teleprompter...Again, Says "From The Time I Got To The Senate 180 Years Ago"
Jill Biden told CNN's Jake Tapper that discussing gaffes is off the table...on the same weekend that her husband had yet another epic gaffe.

[watch.thewest.com.au]

@w0tn0t There is a hilarous clip of Governor Whitmer needing to read her own name off a teleprompter, and bungling it.

Trump can speak extemporaneously and he is a badass standup comedian.

When Reagan gave his speech justifying the bombing of Libya, watch his eyes.
They're stable and locked on the camera. There's a speech on his desk but he's not looking at it.

Watch Trump's eyes. They are stable. Watch Hillary's eyes. She's in a continuous epileptic
seizure.

Yes it would be hilarous to separate Democrats from their speachwriters and teleprompters.
They won't do it, so let's write our own SNL-style skit.

We want a political super bowl!

We want a fair fight between the champions of each conference, a clash of titans. Only this can settle things. Notice that Democrats evade this bowl.

Lots of names come to mind for the Republican all-star team, such as Gingrich, Carlson, Gutfeld, Hannity, Watters, Perino, Coulter, Yiannopoulos, etc.

Can anyone think of a worthy Democrat with game? The only one I can think of is Tulsi
Gabbard. Carlson often invites Gabbard on his show and they have a rich dialogue. This is one
of the few bowls going on.

If you want to be champion you have to take on all competition. Trump daringly takes on the press in press conferences, and he does it often.

Biden press conferences, on the rare occasion that they happen, are softball games, not hardball games. Hannity stationed a cameraman outside the Biden complex with a live feed to his show and he dared Biden to come out and answer questions. Biden never appeared.

Democrats want you to think that the game has already been played and that they won, and that they are the moral superiority party. No. They are the moral inferiority party because they did not show up to the bowl. They lose by default.

How can we create situations where Democrats are forced to tackle hard questions?

@jaymaron Yes she has been my pick all along too. I don't agree with her on everything, but if anyone is the hope for the side it is her.

You're confused - #BasementBiden aka #HidenBiden was the gutless moron hiding in his basement.

Funny, that's just how you sound right now.

@w0tn0t

@JacksonNought

Only truthful words this bumbling idiot has said!

@w0tn0t

@JacksonNought

Guess you missed the Meuller Report - there was no collusion.
However there WAS collusion between the Democrats & Russia to try frame Trump - the #SteeleDossier which was paid for by the Democrats

@w0tn0t actually the Mueller report was heavily redacted, and there was massive obstruction and tampering preventing a conclusive result. Mueller strictly said he could not say there was no collusion.

What is it with you Australians suddenly joining this site to promote pro-Trump talking points?

@JacksonNought

Redacted yet NO EVIDENCE of RUSSIAN COLLUSION. Even stated at the enquiry!
Are you that ignorant to the fact that whatever happens in the USA affects other nations?
Or didnt they teach you that at school

@w0tn0t obstructing evidence usually means no evidence. There is also zero evidence for Trump's "stolen election" claims, yet you all seem to believe it.

@JacksonNought there was no collusion - even Mueller stated that!

@w0tn0t that is a Trump tweet / quote.

[politico.eu]

Mueller refutes Trump’s ‘no collusion, no obstruction’ line

@JacksonNought

Even from our lefty media

Mueller report found no evidence of Trump collusion with Russia.

Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation did not find evidence that President Donald Trump's campaign "conspired or coordinated" with Russia to influence the 2016 presidential election, the Attorney General William Barr says

[smh.com.au]

@w0tn0t oh, quote Barr. Yeah, he's real trustworthy.

“The president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed,” Mueller told the House judiciary committee, adding that Trump could theoretically be indicted after he leaves office.

“We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”

@JacksonNought

Reported by LEFTY media. But you missed that.
As for Politico - if it leaned any further left it'd fall over.

@w0tn0t doesn't matter who is reporting it. It matters who is quoted.

@JacksonNought

Next you'll be quoting Comey, Brannan, Clapper, Cuomo, MSNBC, CNN.....

@w0tn0t I think a quote from Mueller about his findings on collision are more accurate than Trump or Barr commenting on Mueller's findings on collision.

@JacksonNought

Mueller a democrat - enough said

Like that moron Schumer claiming they had irrefutable evidence - he had SFA evidence & no evidence from Mueller

@JacksonNought

you can rant on about russian collusion - provide credible evidence - theire is NONE

@w0tn0t

there was no collusion - even Mueller stated that!

That's a direct quote from you above. I showed you that no, he most certainly did not state that. You changed the subject to Liberal media and then moved the goalpost to "oh well Mueller is a Democrat".

Also, no, Mueller is a Republican.

You can rant about election fraud - provide credible evidence - there is none.

@JacksonNought Only Russian collusion was with the Democrats & their attempts to frame Trump.

And you missed this - there was voter fraud

Democrat Vernon Jones Exposes His Own Party in Georgia for Election Fraud
[rumble.com]

@w0tn0t you are changing the subject.

@JacksonNought
Collusion & voter fraud - you're deflecting.

@w0tn0t address my Mueller comments first. Explain how quoting his actual statement isn't as reliable as what Trump or Barr claim he said? Also, explain how he is somehow a Democrat when he is a registered and avowed Republican.

Trump did a pretty good job framing himself. He implicated himself on live TV multiple times. Members of his campaign staff and administration were convicted based on the investigations.

Am I supposed to take the word of some man at a Trump rally as being evidence of voter fraud? You know Trump's boy Barr said there was no fraud. Brian Kemp was endorsed by Trump, and was a Trump stooge, yet even he said there was no fraud. One of the slimiest people ever, Mitch McConnell, said there was no fraud. I guess that settles it?

@JacksonNought

No collusion!
Voter Fraud

@JacksonNought

You started this thread - go back to your original post

@w0tn0t because yelling it like Trump's incoherent childish rambling really gets your point across, hm?

I said it in another thread, and I'll say it again. You call Russian collusion a hoax, and you call the Ukraine corruption / impeachment a hoax. There are people who don't see them as a hoax, they see mountains of evidence validating it. I believe Trump's "I won, by a lot" narrative, and accusations of election fraud as a hoax. There are people who think it is real, and see mountains of evidence. I am sure your opinion depends on which side of the aisle you fall on, and your feelings for Trump. Unfortunately we are such a divided nation right now that we all have our own facts, there is no accepted objective truth anymore. I don't see this changing any time soon.

@JacksonNought

Only collusion was between the Democrats & the Russians trying to frame Trump.
And there was voter fraud & in Georgia as stated by Democrat Vernon Jones

@w0tn0t there was no voter fraud as stated by Bill Barr. There was no voter fraud as stated by all the Democrats who didn't object to the EC vote. So... your one person doesn't amount to much.

@JacksonNought

Tell that to Vernon Jones

@w0tn0t you're a fool.

@JacksonNought

You're self projecting

@w0tn0t