Re: 'Pedophiles are Infiltrating the LGBT movement'
"Anything goes" clearly doesn't apply to sex, so let's seriously discuss what goes and what doesn't. I think the real test of modern sexual liberation will be the discernment of immoral sexual behavior from perfectly moral behavior.
If we fail to condemn truly immoral sexual behavior then we risk collapsing into fractionated communities where restrictive sexual norms are enforced in some and chaos reigns in another. This won't be good for anyone because some sexual liberation is needed in this time of effective contraception but reasonable regulations need to be in place.
No pedophiles, no sexualized drag kids, no teenage transitioning, no more than 4 genders (if that), and no changing gender day-by-day. Does that sound like a good start?
The problem today is that 'condemning' anything is "problematic" unless it is happening on the Right.
No one on the Left wants to condemn anyone/anything of the Left - it awakens the mob.
So, people that speak up have to be fairly confident that the attacks that will come will be toothless. I can't be 'cancelled'. I can't be fired. Doxing doesn't work because all my info is already available out there and 'blackmail' is nothing but a joke to me. My friends and family would be 'meh' is someone tried to point to me and shriek like Donald Sutterland.
That said - step up, stand out, speak. It is necessary. I do agree with your list.
Well... I guess as a leftie you're appealing to me (sorry if thats a bit vein) but yes and no.
>Pedophiles can fuck off. ( the [how] is harder but I want to reduce the global pedophile count to zero, and no acceptance in society should be given)
>So can sexualising kids.
>Kids probably shouldn't be in shows of any kind but a kid doing drag in innocous for fun. But when its performing in a sexual way. No. Fuck off with that shite.
>The same applies to child beauty pageants. They are creepy as shit.
Literally every leftist I've talked to agrees 100%.
>No teenage transitioning.
Now I agree that the overmedicated US and the underfunded NHS Britain both have a habit of putting kids and teenagers on hormone blockers literally prematurely. But ideally I want to (in the UK) fund the NHS better so that everyone can get access to more therapy earlier and for longer before transition. In the US the road will be longer and rockier.
This will decrease the number of detransitioners and give the most people access to a happier and more complete transition. This might want to be accompanied with a paradigm change where you delay child transition as long as safely possible, and once transition starts, the children are closely and personally monitored for wellbeing purposes and so if its the wrong path for them their treatment can be redirected quickly and effectively.
I say this because transition is more complete and healthier the younger it is conducted. With exception of genital development (for later SRS) every other secondary sexual feature is better transitioned if transition is done younger and this is invaluable for trans people in terms of both their dysphoria, their future and societal treatment. (although there are some who will elect for a later treatment or no medical transitions for other valid reasons).
(Lastly I kinda wanna say, I feel detransitioners often give themselves a hard time. Even if you do that you are still worthy of love and are valid. Going through that shouldn't be the end of the world.)
(I'm not sure exactly what you mean by this, what do you think is acceptable. man, woman, enby-bigender, enby-agender, enby-other? Like I would actually like 3 legalised genders Man, Woman, Non Binary (with maybe specifics in non-binary but having it as a legal catchall). Enby is another word for Non Binary by the way).