Legal Fiction Treasonous Fraud
V
Fake
by Joe Kelley
3-22-2023

Donald Trump exposes the new world order is in control of the old collapsing world.
7 hours ago
[rumble.com]

Persecute Fraudulently Accused Witches
V
Fraudulent Witches Fraudulent Accusers

JUAN O' SAVIN & SCOTT MCKAY: MILITARY WILL RESTORE LAWFUL GOVERNMENT!
9 months ago
[rumble.com]

Martial Lawyers Marshaling Witches
V
Marshals Misleading Martial Lawyers

Those WHO know, intimately, their next step towards the supply of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help US God, risk false steps that cost dearly to those who demand the supply of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help US God, because The Deceiver is a crafty Word Speller.

Above are Media Products, where one is current, and the other one is almost antiquated in the history that documents the march of humans being led into inhuman history.

Blidingly.

Debate in Virginia Ratifying Convention
June 6, 1788
George Mason:
“Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?”

Essay on The Trial by Jury
by Lysander Spooner, 1852
“For more than six hundred years—that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215—there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.”

"It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States.”

Primed and ready for Actionable Intelligence, the patriotic defenders of humanity are afforded DATA on a need-to-know basis, because every missed opportunity to make a victorious step toward the goal costs humanity a measure of innocent blood which is now flowing like rivers into an ocean sized pool, to satiate an insatiable lust for it.

Obstruction with contempt leads to greater stupidity, servility, and oceans of innocent blood.

What was the definition of criminal insanity?

Forget about it.

Give generously to known psychopaths the keys to their justified and fully warranted invitation to Trial by Jury assembled in their honor, to save them, and all of humanity, from their poor choices, doing them a favor as well as everyone else.

In fact.

The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts
by Roger Roots
Page 40
Private Prosecutors
"For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action.

"Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were prohibited from withdrawing the action pursuant to private agreement with the defendant. Court intervention was occasionally required to compel injured crime victims to appear against offenders in court and "not to make bargains to allow [defendants] to escape conviction, if they...repair the injury."

Page 42
Law Enforcement as a Universal Duty

"Law enforcement in the Founders' time was a duty of every citizen. Citizens were expected to be armed and equipped to chase suspects on foot, on horse, or with wagon whenever summoned. And when called upon to enforce the laws of the state, citizens were to respond "not faintly and with lagging steps, but honestly and bravely and with whatever implements and facilities [were] convenient and at hand. Any person could act in the capacity of a constable without being one, and when summoned by a law enforcement officer, a private person became a temporary member of the police department. The law also presumed that any person acting in his public capacity as an officer was rightfully appointed."

Say it isn't so.

Joe.

Psssst, do I have a deal of a lifetime?

How about this gift, just for you? You only need to accept the free gift, and from then on you get everything you deserve to have, no strings attached.

Sound good?

You can have, forevermore, freedom from moral responsibility, and all you have to do is sign at the bottom of the CONTRACT.

Freedom at last!

Have a nice day.

Caveat Emptor