Obama as an individual is powerless, the power of "Obama" is collective, meaning a sum total of all those who agree to empower "Obama" or the next "Leader" figure leading those people sharing the same power network.

With that in mind I do not think that The Voting System in National Elections has anything to do with who is or is not in power, other than to create a false sense of security in The System, which is done to weaken any powers against those who empower people like Obama.

"Do you believe Obama can come back to power without being voted ?"

The Voting System has been forensically investigated and found to be fraudulent. Is that something you know or something you do not know?

"Do you believe the Dems can put him back overriding the constitution ?"

The people who constitute all the people within the "Dems" power network include many people who have very different ideals concerning what the "Dems" at the top of the power network are intending to do, and doing as intended. This is the same with the Elephants in the same room.

Donkeys and Elephants represent many people networked for the same goals as determined by those leading Donkeys and Elephants to their own enslavement or slaughter. This is a well established consequence to Involuntary Association or Subsidized Slavery, or Crime, whereby the actions perpetrated by criminals always end up consuming everything including the criminals themselves.

Example of establishing this fact that matters concerning the inevitability of criminals in gangs making criminal choices to enslave, consume, and destroy innocent people:

Psalms:
"Hear, my son, your father's instruction And do not forsake your mother's teaching; Indeed, they are a graceful wreath to your head And ornaments about your neck. My son, if sinners entice you, Do not consent. If they say, "Come with us, Let us lie in wait for blood, Let us ambush the innocent without cause Let us swallow them alive like Sheol, Even whole, as those who go down to the pit; We will find all kinds of precious wealth, We will fill our houses with spoil; Throw in your lot with us, We shall all have one purse," My son, do not walk in the way with them. Keep your feet from their path, For their feet run to evil And they hasten to shed blood. Indeed, it is useless to spread the baited net In the sight of any bird ; 18 But they lie in wait for their own blood; They ambush their own lives. So are the ways of everyone who gains by violence ; It takes away the life of its possessors."

Modern evidences of this confirmed (until unconfirmed) with The Scientific Method - as far as I know - as a criminal brain turns to mush when exposed to absolute power too long.

It is worse, since failing to defend one's self, including one's species, works similarly on the natural power of moral conscience detrimentally.

In other words, a gang of insane criminals will turn everyone into insane criminals if no one or no group of people rally in defense, overpowering the criminal forces. This is illustrated and confirmed in historical records as so-called "Empires" Rise and Fall.

"Do you believe the Dems can put him back overriding the constitution ?"

The Constitution of 1789 is a confession of guilt signed by the gangs of criminals who wrote the document they then published as part of their plan to Monopolize Power in Profit in America. The previous Federal Agreement that established the Federation of Independent States, under the common laws of free people, was The Articles of Confederation, which was the First Constitution of The United States of America. The second Constitution (1789) was a deal made between Aristocrats seeking Monarchy, Warmongers seeking profits from wars in which they fund both sides routinely, Central Banking Frauds, and Slave Consumers which includes all criminals involved in the criminal slave trade.

Which constitution do you think the Dems may override?

From the first criminal administration of the Consolidated States (after 1789), those in absolute power began overriding common laws protecting natural rights, exemplified with The Whiskey Rebellion Proclamation and subsequent enforcement of a National Tax to fund a Central Bank Fraud and Extortion racket.

If there are any of the so-called "Presidents" since George Washington's criminal reign, where the presiding officer attempted to return to Rule of Law, I am unfamiliar with that information. Each apparent attempt to return to Rule of Law, such as Andrew Jackson "killing the bank," was a counter move countering competitors seeking absolute power, not a network of defenders seeking to return to rule of law.

"Do you believe the ppl will accept it without questioning because they think he is better than what we got now ?"

The ways people are led in unconscionable paths unjustified with moral reason include natural forces such as is exemplified with psychopaths born mutated and having no capacity for moral conscience, free to enslave people at will, and free to do so with very effective deception methods, such as is illustrated with terms such as Mind Control, Manufactured Consent, Brainwashing, False Advertising, False Propagandizing, and this networking of brainwashers into one powerful group of deceivers includes something called Public School.

People are captured at birth, exposed to a false narrative each day, and before long each individual is either programed to obey without question, and then consumed by their masters, or the programing confuses the individual to a point of rebellion against The System, which is a very diverse path through life in a world so deceived.

"Do you believe the ppl will accept it without questioning because they think he is better than what we got now ?"

Donkeys and Elephants - as a rule - just follow orders without question. They "believe" what they are told to believe, such as the "Integrity of Elections."

Elections have no integrity, so how many people are demonstrably stupid?

"Do you believe all this was already planned?"

Each action by each individual is a mixture of preparing to act (planning) and acting without planning (reacting), and if power moves from some people to other people, invariably those gaining power are those hatching a plan, and executing a plan, while those growing weak as they lose power are "reacting" or not "reacting" to their loss.

Some people pay other people to rob them blind.

How many people are like that in your network of people?

"Do you believe the American ppl are powerless?"

Since Ruby Ridge, then Waco, then The Oklahoma City Bombing, began a movement in America, I have been an integrated part of that plan, that network, and this is a defensive network gaining power against the criminals powers that work to enslave mankind, which leads to extinction.

All defensive powers are targets in the eyes of all the most powerful criminal gangs, and one of their very well work tactics is to infiltrate defensive networks, to control defensive networks from inside of them, and then to turn defensive networks into either powerless networks incapable of defense, or to turn defensive networks into offensive - criminal - networks.

A defensive network is by form and function independent. Defensive networks grow from grass-roots organically. There is a rich history of defensive networks growing in this organic, natural, way, such as the formation of the American Federation of Independent States between 1774 and 1789.

Offensive networks - as a rule - operate in form and function as if those involved are building a Pyramid, with one most powerful criminal on top, and lesser criminal powers of increasing numbers going down each stratified level of criminal power, all of which over-rule anyone capable of producing anything worth stealing, including children.

"Do you believe the American ppl are powerless?"

Most of the people gravitating to the Ron Paul Presidential Campaign were young people. That is a very good indicator that the next generation is in better hands, despite their exposures to Public Schools and the False Propaganda intended to enslave them.