[twitter.com]

Arizona State Senate
September 24, 2021
Report Concerning the Maricopa County Forensic Election Audit

To give currency to known frauds, aiding and abetting their crimes, connecting their falsehoods to their intended victims, is at minimum the crime of accessory.

“Spreading democracy,” for example, is a nice sounding way to cover-up intentionally brainwashing people into blind obedience.

To do so willfully would be malevolent. To do so out of ignorance would be criminally negligent, given the facts that matter with this misprision of treason case.

I was able to listen to some of the evidence presented during the Arizona assembly of criminals, they are all criminals in all offices of government, since none of them prosecute anyone else in their criminal gangs, despite an abundance of evidence proving beyond doubt that all governments in America are corrupt from top to bottom in various criminal acts from misprision of treason to criminal negligence or nonfeasance.

Let me repeat that for the ignorant among us.

From top to bottom in all governments in America corruption is embodied in each and every paid member paid out of a FUND criminally extorted from anyone in America still capable of producing anything worth stealing – including children – despite the costs imposed on Americans by the worst psychopathic criminals at the top of the criminal food chain. Follow the money to the FUND, could be done by any one of those officers occupying any of those offices of government, and that evidence discovered during that investigation warrants a formal accusation naming the culprits at the end of that food chain, forming a grand jury, presenting the named accused suspect with a court date before a trial jury.

No one in government uses the law to “Drain the Swamp,” so they are all, thereby, caught red-handed, perpetrating, at the very least, nonfeasance.

To claim, as so many sycophants will claim, that “they” are doing the best they can in an imperfect world were mankind is so flawed, and if “we” (the sycophants) just “elect” better people “the system” will work for “our” benefit, as it is designed to do, given the obvious faults of mankind.

Most sycophants could not formulate such an arrangement of words above, they would be saying the same thing, if they merely parrot one word: OBEY.

The law, in any case whatsoever, is not about obedience, as “we” are told, it is accurate accountability of the facts that matter in any case of controversy JUST in time to save any unwarranted damage done to anyone by anyone else thoughtlessly or with malice.

Not OBEY, rather deterrence, or a method by which all the people within the boundaries of human morality, are prevented in their own minds, from choosing a criminal path, thereby saving people from the expense of funding criminals, saving the criminals themselves from a life of crime. Stop paying the criminals, and people stop choosing crime, and how can that moral goal ever be reached when people choose ignorance, apathy, blind obedience, bribes, falsehood, extortion, assault, kidnapping, torture, murder, and mass murder INSTITUTIONALIZED and dressed up as moral government?

The sycophants will be made to think, told to think, brainwashed into thinking, that the blame falls on the species mankind, as “we” are imperfect beings, and “we” are prone to choose evil over good, and therefore “we” need to “elect” better leaders to make us what “we” are not naturally, which is peaceful, moral, just, righteous, kind, creative, polite, nice, helpful, beings. “We” need “fearless leader” to beat us, bribe us, threaten us, torture us, murder us, and mass murder us, until we follow their leadership, and bend to their will, so as to hammer mankind into a moral, peaceful, condition.
It makes sense to sycophants?

How?

Nonfeasance.

“There are faults of omission as well as commission. When you are legally called to try such a cause, if you shall shuffle out yourself, and thereby persons perhaps less conscientious happen to be made use of, and so a villain escapes justice, or an innocent man is ruined, by a prepossessed or negligent verdict; can you think yourself in such a case wholly blameless? Qui non prohibet cum potest, jubet: That man abets an evil, who prevents it not, when it is in his power. Nec caret scrupulo sosietatis occultae qui evidenter facinori definit obviare: nor can he escape the suspicion of being a secret accomplice, who evidently declines the prevention of an atrocious crime.”

If side A is convinced that side B is guilty of this, that, and all those other things, and side B is convinced that side A is guilty of this, that, and all those other things, then where are the court cases used to determine which side is full of shit, and which side is reporting the facts that matter in the case?