slug.com slug.com
2 0

The problem here, at least as I see it, is that both sides (Nationalist and Globalist) ignore (there is no evidence that it exists) actual rule of law, and both sides thereby also have in common (they agree) with their reliance upon counterfeit rule of law. All of this pay to play divide and conquer explosive bullshit can be put back in place (like stuffing the toothpaste back in the tube, or putting the genie back in the bottle) with actual rule of law in short order. The two sides agree that returning to rule of law is verboten, so with that in mind, which side are the Nationalists and Globalists on compared to those who prefer accurate accountability of the facts that matter in any case involving conflict that goes beyond the boundaries of peace and harmony? Not utopia, rather the work required to discover the facts, to bring conflicting sides to a Court of Law, to argue both sides before The People as a whole, represented by trial jurors randomly selected to represent the whole people as one, and then The People adjudicate the matter lawfully, determine guilt or innocence based upon the facts presented, published, and for public consumption, and determine a just sentence in a timely manner so as to thereby arrest the current conflicts and deter future conflicts effectively, efficiently, at the least cost to humanity within the boundaries of human laws, natural laws, economic laws, and even just religious laws. Both sides (not all sides) ignore (there is no evidence that it exists) the due process that was employed during the Revolution in America, and put in place, documented, with a Declaration of Independence, and a Bill of Rights. Where is the law? Why are there no grand jurors working to discover the facts, employing their power at law, which includes the power of subpoena AND POSSE COMITATUS?

Josf-Kelley 8 Jan 8
Share
You must be a member of this group before commenting. Join Group

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Res ipsa loquitur; as in self-evident. When the criminals take-over - as a rule - they injure innocent people if nothing lawful is done to stop them. If we all just want to be criminals, then that becomes self-evident. Accusation goes to independent grand jurors, those people (who are not the government: independent) command all jurisdiction civil and criminal, including subpoena and posse comitatus. The accused (no matter who it is, and no matter who the accuser is) that probably is causing harm, a clear and present danger to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, peace, harmony, property, accurate voting, due process of law, is invited to a speedy trial before The People. I'm not professing to be a professor here, this is self-evident, and backed up in historical precedent, not the least of which is the Amending of the 1789 Constitution with a Bill of Rights. Hello crickets.

0

Time 15:00 or so the question arrives on the table concerning so-called "tort," and that was mired in to ambiguities (purposeful) of so-called "Standing." If there was a lesson learned and relearned to a point at which people had had enough of counterfeit law, then that hard won education was codified into what is known as The Ancient Law (perhaps forgotten by most, or beat out of people from birth with false propaganda), also known as The Law of the Land, also known as the common law, also known as due process of law, and on common with all the principles of morality, the "decider" in any case of controversy, civil or criminal, are the people, not someone claiming to be the government, randomly selected (by lot) to represent the people as a whole, so as to avoid any bias of any faction whatsoever. Also, there was, is, and will be at law an equal footing, meaning each individual can accuse each other individual and the same wheels of justice turn the same way, based upon the merits of the case, again, not based upon which faction claims authority over a counterfeit version of law, because they can. Lessons were learned, and so these authorities with names like Bannon, or the lawyer dude, are accountable as either ignorant authorities (authorities of ignorance) or willfully false (authorities of willful ignorance) as they pretend to speak the truth. They don't. An accusation at law (by anyone) involving injuries to the public at large is a criminal matter, and the accusation then moves to an independent, common law, grand jury. The grand jury commands all legal powers including subpoena and posse comitatus. The grand jury, in a case of actual crime, MUST by duty be bound, to issue an invitation for the accused to appear in a Court of Law before The People who are represented by an independent common law Trial Jury. All of that is done expediently or it is OUTSIDE THE LAW. Apply that to anyone claiming (under penalty of perjury determined by a trial jury) that anyone else, including Bidens, including Gates, including Pelosis, are clear and present dangers to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, property, and RULE OF LAW. Criminal does a crime, someone discovers it, grand jury takes the case, a Court Date is on the calendar, the Trial goes before The People. The People adjudicate the matter according to - at least - The Bill of Rights. People are thereby defended in time, even the criminals, because the power of deterrence helps criminals decide a peaceful path, because crime no longer pays in the Country where Rule of Law is agreed up and employed as was, as it is, and it can continue to be what it is in fact.

Recent Visitors 3

Photos 19 More

Posted by Josf-KelleyWanted for Treason That is all for lack of intelligence and moral conscience.

Posted by Josf-KelleyBorrowed from another IDW post is the pictured meme.

Posted by Josf-KelleyReal Reality A few people have purchased the exclusive power to add zeros to their Bank account balance, and they accomplish this feat by borrowing their spending from anyone who can produce ...

Posted by HeresiarchWhy you should close Social Media accounts you no longer use. (I shut down my LinkedIn account immediately)

Posted by HeresiarchI taught my daughter to shoot at ten years old. Now she's passing on the lessons she learned.

Posted by HeresiarchIt's taken us years to rehabilitate the soil on our Better Than Organic farmlet.

Posted by Josf-KelleyThat is a complex process viewed simplistically in two directions that appear, in simple form, to be opposites.

Posted by Josf-KelleyThe level of brainwashing or mind control, or spirit control, or body control, or behavior control is demonstrably on a sub-conscious level and it runs very deep.

Posted by HeresiarchHow do you sacrifice children?

Posted by HeresiarchHow's that Police State workin' out for y'all?

Posted by Josf-KelleyFrom a source:

Posted by Josf-KelleyTrump says Pence can reject criminal votes.

Posted by Josf-KelleyFrom another IDW post: Roadmap to re-inauguration:

Posted by Josf-KelleyAt a Pennsylvania State Hearing, widespread voter and election fraud is reported by witness testimony.

Posted by Josf-KelleyThe following link is immediately censored from Facebook, as I press the enter button, a warning page loads.

Posted by Josf-KelleyI was banished (for speaking the truth to power) from Culture War (IDW topics) and occasionally I am presented with posts in my feed that lead to that exclusive group, so I can't enter, and a I can't ...

  • Top tags#government #USA #rights #video #world #truth #money #crime #evidence #laws #reason #freedom #evil #children #justice #god #death #TheTruth #society #vote #liberty #federal #moral #media #Police #community #hope #violence #Constitution #hell #crimes #biden #book #military #earth #fear #politics #murder #created #Present #humanity #Congress #democrats #liberal #population #slavery #China #IDW #nation #politicians ...

    Members 37Top

    Moderator