I DISCOVERED HOW A SMALL GROUP OF PEOPLE CAN FOOL MOST OF THE WORLD POPULATION IN JUST A FEW MONTHS, YET IM OPTIMISTIC - CORONA IS NOT AS DANGEROUS AS FIRST THOUGHT, THE DANGER HAS BEEN GREATLY EXAGERATED

Corona is not as dangerous as was thought - The WHO first announced 3,4% mortality rate, thats in line with number given to the Spanish flu of 1918, this has been adjusted, but I believe official updated numbers are still 0.5% mortality rate, but this percent is stil to high, many independent experts belief the mortality rate number is the same as the seasonal flu 0.1%, and there are studies to back this up. The corona pandemic is a fraud, its danger is at the level of the normal flu, it should not be called a dangerous pandemic, you can see this in the yearly excess death statistics of your country. The danger and spread of corona are being greatly exagerated, there is enough documentation and expert witness to demonstrate this to anyone that wishes to have a look at it.

Many doctors, and specialists in epidemiology, virology, immunology, statisticians, and researchers have tried to communicate the many scientific inconsistencies about the corona situation, but have been ignored, censored, and even bullied. These doctors and experts, which are now in the thousands, have form their own investigations with the help of layers are taking it to court. This seems to be the only way for them to be heard.

A GREAT VICTORY, THE IMPERIAL COLLEGE MODEL, WITH ITS DOOM PREDICTIONS, WAS PROVEN TOTALLY UNRELIABLE

In UK Lawyer Francis Hoar, businessman Simon Dolan and Wed lake Bell, asked what scientific evidence was used by ministers when they decided to shut down the UK on March 23. He had sought to obtain minutes from meetings of the government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage). But the government refused to publish Sage minutes. So he went to high court to seek permission for an urgent judicial review of the background to the lockdown imposed on 23 March. The 30 May 2020, it released the Sage minutes.

The heralded model United Kingdom experts have largely used to guide their coronavirus policies is “totally unreliable,” according to experts. The criticisms follow a series of policy turnabouts, including Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s decision to extend the national lockdown. The United States also used the model, which predicted upwards of 2.2 million deaths in the US without proper action. The prediction helped influence the White House to adopt a more serious approach to the pandemic.

Professor’s model for coronavirus predictions should not have been used - The response to Covid-19 in the UK, the US and other countries was shaped by the dramatic headlines in mid-March, suggesting 550,000 deaths in the UK and 2.2 million in the US. Faced with widely publicised, alarming figures, as demonstrated by Imperial College’s Professor Neil Ferguson, governments were forced to react with the unprecedented lockdown to suppress Covid-19. No one looked at his ten years of predictions that were wrong. His previous model produced wildly inacurate results. - [thetimes.co.uk]

The Imperial College model of professor Neil Ferguson, on which UK, US, and many other countries based their doom predictions on, is totally unreliable - How Replicable is the Imperial College Model? [lockdownsceptics.org]

ANOTHER GREAT VICTORY SOON? PCR TEST (CORONA TEST) PAPER RETRACTION REQUEST, & CEASE AND DESIST PAPERS SERVED TO THE DEVELOPER OF THE PCR TEST

Since July , 2020, lawyer Reiner Fuellmich and the Corona Investigation Committee has been listening to a large number of international scientists and experts' testimony. The danger and spread of the corona virus are being greatly exaggerated, and the restriction measures are extremely disproportionate.

PCR tests, contrary to the assertions of Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, do not give any indication of an infection with any virus. PCR tests expressly not approved for diagnostic purposes, as is correctly noted on leaflets coming with these tests. Even the United States CDC agrees with this. Even Drosten himself declared in an interview in 20, that these PCR tests are so highly sensitive that even very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive. And if you increase the number of cycles at wich the PCR is set (wich is what Drosten, the codeveloper recomended) it will test even more false positives.

A number of highly respected scientists worldwide assume that there has never been a corona pandemic but only a PCR test pandemic. There was a real wave of disease in March and April but since then everything has gone back to normal ... it is sufficient for the so-called herd immunity that to 25 percent of the population are infected with the allegedly new coronavirus to stop the further spread of the virus, and this has long been the case. Dr Yeadon in his piece: ‘Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics - the Deadly Danger of False Positives’ explains the complete unsuitability of the test for the detection of infectious diseases. Covid 19 has tested positive in goats, sheep, papayas and even chicken wings.

In November 2020 - Review of report in support of PCR, Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020 - External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results. "This paper will show numerous serious flaws in the Corman-Drosten paper, the significance of which has led to worldwide misdiagnosis of infections attributed to SARS-CoV-2 and associated with the disease COVID-19," the researchers write in their peer review. - [cormandrostenreview.com]

Next day, a retraction request letter to Eurosurveillance editorial board - The researchers are requesting a retraction letter from the authors of the January study published by Eurosurveillance, including German scientists Dr. Christian Dorsten (developer of PCR test) and Dr. Victor Corman. External Review and request to retract the paper of Corman et al, published in Eurosurveillance January 23, 2020. - [cormandrostenreview.com]

The of december 2020, cease and desist papers served on Prof. Dr. Christian Drosten (developer of PCR corona test) by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich. - [cormandrostenreview.com]

Fuellmich says judges around the world are currently networking and standing up. Literally: "The judges will not allow the planned corporate dictatorship". Lawsuit against Drosten and PCR test will also be filed in New York.

Follow lawyer Fuellmichs corona investigation:
Corona Investigative Committee - [corona-ausschuss.de]
[vimeo.com]
[t.me] (Telegram)
www.youtube.com/StiftungCoronaAusschuss

OVERVIEW - THE CASE AGAINST THE PROMOTERS OF THE CORONA PANIC

The best introduction to the basics of this pandemic fraud is the video of German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich, in this video he presents his case against the promoters of the "corona panic, the in developer of the PCR test (most used corona test), the leader of WHO which recommended this test be used worldwide, and the the leader of the German Center for Disease control which kept announcing that the situation was very grave and threatening although the figures compiled by his own institute proved the exact opposite. He is suing them for Crimes Against Humanity!

PDFS for reassurance of facts, and sharing with your skeptical friends:

• 1- The case against the promoters of the corona panic - [docdro.id]
• 2- Documentation and references - [docdro.id]

... AND THE MANY INSPIRING PEOPLE I HAVE MET & HEARD/READ, PEOPLE WITH WISDOM, JUSTICE & COURAGE, AND THE MANY COMMUNITIES ORGANIZING INITIATIVES & PLATFORMS, THANKS

I feel somewhat optimistic as we can see how things are going now history has consistently shown things get a lot worse before they improve . Something bad has to happen for the fire of good to ignite for some odd reason .

I suspect that government will try to extend lock downs, perhaps citing virus mutations as an excuse, and I believe the public will rebel. BLM and Antifa will weigh in, and the protests will reach a new level of violence (I know people on each side who are looking forward to it). Anger will replace weariness as most people's mindset.

I'm neither optimistic nor pessimistic. Maybe wary and determined? Not sure how to categorize it.

2021 will be better. If they distribute this vaccine nationally and used military resources to implement it. I hope people take the shots. I'm hopeful the conspiracy anti vaccine crowd will be a small minority. Achieving herd immunity will be achieved if majority takes the vaccine. I'm tired of the crazies. @Admin. On another note, comment button is working strangely, even worse on the other site. Happy New Year to you.

Confused and not sure what to think.

I'm uncertain in terms of world affairs.