An alien invasion would fix the race problem pretty quickly lol

I'm going to shift lanes a little, because I don't think anything I'd say directly to the point would change anyone's opinion. What I will suggest is Murray is absolutely right when he says we must find a way for those on the left side of the bell curve to live fulfilling lives. In a world requiring an increasingly cognitively-abled workforce, with AI entering the picture, and no shortage of high IQ South Asians and median IQ folks from south of the border, this country is going to have to deal with this issue

I don't think Love or Hate comes into it. Facts are facts.

Jesus said, "Thou shalt not be a Racist."

Race realism isn't a message at all. I'm simply an acknowledgment of the obvious that virtually everyone recognized until an endless barrage of PC propaganda bullied people into saying that there is no difference between the races - even though no one actually believes that.

Denying the reality of differences between the races has become a favored manner of virtue signaling among the left.

I admit, I’m sad to see the Caucasian race declining. It’s mostly races of Catholic and Muslims that are breeding now.

You can’t deny that Caucasians are the most beautiful. Asians are intelligent, but Caucasians are beautiful and Caucasians have the strongest immune system

I fairly familiar with the studies into IQ that Molyneux references, while there were many bogus studies back in that day that were brought on by a lot of racism, there are plenty of modern studies that show that IQ does differ by race, country, culture, etc and so forth, and it has less to do with race and more to do with everything else. The interesting thing is those studies showed that if you take someone from Africa with a 75 IQ, in one single generation living in a western country, their children have an average 10 points higher than their parents, and it increases every generation if nurtured. That's great news and proves that most's IQ can be improved with education, healthy diet and the right environment . We all have different IQ's are due to our environment and our evolutionary tract. If a tribal people have literally done the same thing for thousands of years, your brain adjusts to needs it isn't challenged in new ways when one is growing up. In more complicated societies, people are raised with a need to figure out complex situations that are new all the time, which would naturally help. Anthropology 101. It doesn't make them stupid, it probably means their brain is more focused on survival and function as opposed to the exercises that we all know increases intelligence: reading, puzzles, math, etc. We also know there are geniuses of every gender and race. I think cultural evolution is a real thing and not something to ignore.

There's also a study that shows that women are more often of average intelligence, while men are more have a very high IQ or a very low IQ. I suspect that is because men are required to be more intelligent for millions of years to protect the family. I accept this fact, even though I'm a woman. Not just because I trust the study, but because I know lots of men and woman and it adds up. I also suspect that men generally start out very intelligent, but then inevitably get brain damage growing up because boys will be boys. People highly underestimate the level of brain damage that some kids and teens subject themselves through sports and just having fun, and I bet some cultures have more brain injuries than others from regular activities. I feel like America has lost a little bit of IQ just from football. I'm a girl and i don't think these facts are sexist. They're just facts. Of course that does not mean that there are no hyper intelligent women or minorities, it just means it's less likely, for all sorts of reasons that have nothing to do with bigotry, just biology and history.

People have differences of ability regardless of race. In a free society, outcomes will differ. Equality of outcome can only be achieved by enslavement of the least and the most competent. Race is a smoke screen for what is REALLY going on. I agree with Morgan - stop talking about it.

Also it's very sad that "discrimination" has been so demonized. The word used to have a positive connotation; a "discriminating" person was someone who noticed differences and made decisions accordingly. Something similar happened with the word "judgment." Making discrimination into a bad word is part of the dumbing down of the population.

The idea that thinking your own group is the best is "preaching hate" is insane and would never be applied in other contexts. For example if someone says their hometown sports team is the best, are they spreading hate towards every other sports team?

It was an evil and cowardly act of Google to ban these speakers from YouTube and kowtow to the evil radical left cult. Google used to have "don't be evil" as their motto but they might have well use "side with evil" as their new motto. Censorship in this country is getting as bad as that of an authoritarian socialist/communist regime. Big tech, schools, mainstream media etc have all become tools of the evil new party/cult/religion of the far left to silence us who have differing views.

"First they came for...
Then they came for..."

They are silencing us one by one and we need to fight back before there's nobody and no platform that allows our voices.

They're not immutable characteristics. Multiple studies have shown this. For example, during WW2, US soldiers impregnated many women in Germany, and many of thise soldiers were black. The black babies growing up in Germany had an average iq equal to the rest of Germany. Whereas, in the US, black babies growing up at the same time period had a lower iq than white Americans. The difference being that in Germany they grew up in German culture, and in the US, they grew up surrounded by black culture.
Its culture that creates the differences.

Disgraceful! But sadly not surprising. I just hope this makes more and more people aware of the true agenda that's going on.

There is no race based set of characteristics beyond how easily some of us burn in the sun. Everything else is culture and, yes, culture is real. There are national cultures, ethnic cultures, religious cultures, sub cultures, etc.

Regardless I am pro free speech. Let someone's argument fail or rise on its own merits. Don't stifle it--especially when you allow people to say the same thing but from an afro-centric perspective. I have had so many videos put in my feed this week by Youtube that hurt and appalled me for their outright mean-spiritedness and general misinformation.

I actually got a video about why white people need to be erased. Be consistent or be a hypocrite.

They didn't say anything that wasn't true...... philosophers are now public enemies? Not right. Stephen was one of the first you tubers I followed over ten years ago. Why all of a sudden are these guys a threat? They're not... it's a war on white men and free speech

Love? Hate? Don't be silly. This is a war. In a war you attack your enemies and protect your friends.

I forgot to add that slave owners didn't hate their slaves anymore than a farmer hates his tractor. Most of the hate comes from the disruption of the class system. You can see the same thing play out with Hillary's deplorables and Obama's clinger speeches. They really do believe they are a better class of people. Trump's election threatened their sense of entitlement. That is also why liberals never seen concerned about exporting pollution and slave labor to China or the appalling human rights abuses against women in Muslim countries. What enrages the left is anything that threatens their superficial sense of moral superiority. They have all been branded like cattle by their own institutions but if they have the smallest brand defect discovered by the mob it's off to the slaughter they go. Ironically humanism has proven to be dehumanizing, I think that was Nieztche's great insight.

I want to say I LOVE red pilled black guys. (no homo : ) But I find them very charming. This is because they bring something very different to the table, i.e. the discussion. They know so many who have been duped--their families, etc. So when they finally realize the truth about leftism, they are much more convincing than a suburban white kid. Or even an urban white kid (like me)

Race realism is a valid conversation, but i think that at the moment it plays into the whole identity politics trap. If "they" (mainstream agenda drivin media) can keep you talking about race, then other more pressing issues get pushed to the side. Things like others have mentioned, like the amount of single parent homes, which contributes to poor education and disfunctional family dynamic, or the lack of gainful employment for untrained workers (production jobs, farm hand jobs, entry level construction jobs) which have been exported and the job pool deliberately diluted by exploited migrants to help keep costs down for our corporate overlords, under the banner of humanitarianism.
The establishment globalist power elite cannot get drawn into a debate over policy because they will lose every time, they cannot even identify as globalist elites, they have no choice but to hi-jack a popular movement like the "left" and much like a parasite devour it from the inside, while useing the husk of its former self as a puppet. Anyone remember when the left stood for personal liberty? Now the left doesn't support the 1st or second amendment, and some are calling for socialism. Most of them don't realize they already live in a quasi socialist country as it is. The parasite has convinced the host to give up its guns, its free speech, and more tax money in pursuit of a utopia that is undefined and out of sight. The host is dieing, and these riots and desperate rallies around shit candidates are its death throws.

Slowly we inch.......
It cannot end well but those who made these decisions know this. Their reasoning is, I won't be here and mine are taken care of, so it does not matter. They are selfish, self-indulgent people and have been negligent custodians of our country. Perhaps, this is what happens when politicians think with one brain (group think and.....). They do not like having their ideas challenged, because after all, they are now celebrities not politicians, think Trudope.

I really don't think it's all that important or interesting a question. The far more important and interesting issue is pointed out in a post below: whether based on race or ethnicity or NOT, the bell curves of intelligence. personality, and social behaviors are as real as those of upper-body strength, physical stamina, height, "natural" body weight, bone density or thickness, body hair, etc. The fact is, every society needs to think about meaningful and productive ways to help the tails of the curves fit into the structures and institutions that every civilization requires if it's to remain civilized. A large part of that has been in the (semi-modern) past a much broader distribution of wealth than exists within the globalist capitalist economics of today, AND a broader distribution of the actual means and locations of all of the various manners of productive endeavor. Every community "enjoys" about 20% fuck-ups. If any community is to meaningfully and gainfully "exploit" its fuck-ups, it needs 10 or 15 % of the other "tail" to sponsor them, mentor them, manage them, CARE about them, and value their efforts--no matter how lowly--with a decent regard for their well-being and livelihood.

And, to make matter worse, we really have to find something for the geniuses to do besides evil and disruption.

I don't think our problems are race nearly so much as they revolve around the idea--shared among mostly the left leaning, anti-social, and deviants--that societies can exist without functional norms.

Call it what you want. It is prejudice. People form opinions of others based on their personal standards of beliefs. We tend to judge or even prejudge others by our personal value systems. Some, who are open and accepting, have the opportunity and the personal skills to choose their friends or acquaintances by their characters as opposed to other, more visible traits. Others make snap decisions and end up with a narrowly defined value system. IMHO

One problem is the practice of categorizing people by "race" or "ethnicity" in the first place. There is far more variation within a particular group than there is across groups. If we are to incorporate the practice of recognizing individual sovereignty, we have to overcome the (like biological) propensity to categorize people like this in the first place. Don't judge a book by its cover.

Another problem is that on a cultural level, at the level of child-rearing, we can't really do much to increase any individual's intelligence, but we sure can hamper it, both psychologically and physiologically. All those kids in Flint, Michigan, who were drinking lead-poisoned city water, that has nothing to do with their genetics.

Mostly, I think the big problem with "race realism" is that it's terribly lazy. It's trying to develop a heuristic for evaluating people at the group level, the tribal level. Sorry, no. To know someone takes time, it takes developing a personal relationship. What goes into making a human being the way the are is terribly complicated. It's not just genetics, it's not just culture, it's not just biological development influenced by environment, and there's an awful lot of random chance thrown in there just for good measure.

We need to grow the hell up.

A case for gun owners r. St louis couple defends home from mob. [slug.com]

Is "Race Realism" a message of love or hate?
It is neither in isolation. Love and hate are passions, it is not reasoning or open careful thinking. The passionate don't need to change there minds.

Race Realism can be used for good or bad.

The big "holy lie" is everyone is the same, this is our hypocrisy.