slug.com slug.com

1 0

LINK L. Ron Hubbard Interview: Introduction To Scientology [1966] - YouTube

Scientology has had a bad rap, but this interview shows that Hubbard is not so different from what Peterson says. Before current psychology. Quite interesting! Man is basically good!

TaraShechinah 2 Oct 25
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

The more difficult it is to describe a philosophy, the less credible it is. Hubbard describes Scientology as difficult to describe as the Encyclopedia Britannica.

Scientology denies human frailty, and denies the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. That renders Scientology a philosophy of similar value as other philosophies, and indifferent to eternal salvation. Scientologists believe in reincarnation - making it not a science. Science is confirmation of theory with repeatable results. No evidence of reincarnation has ever been presented, and belief has been presented instead.

As an engineer and a severe skeptic, having studied philosophies and the Resurrection, I have come to believe the latter, and have no confidence in Scientology, except as a philosophy that contains some good advice. I think modern physics supports this conclusion. Unfortunately, Scientology plays into the human tendency toward self-delusion.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:376664
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.