What mental conditions exist at the extremes of political spectrum ?
Particular are you ?
Equal and opposite mental issues are the source of extreme manifestations of hate and disorder.
Iām not sure differentiating or pigeonholing aberrant sociopathies, perversions and insanities accomplishes as much as, at first it May seem.
I AM fairly certain that their conditions are useful to those who profit from chaos or sell hate for votes.
10
Be part of the movement!
Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.Create your free account
5 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.
It's not the wings; it's that the head and the ass are on the same animal.
GaryMysels
Level 8
Sep 28, 2022
1
The more extreme a person is politically, the greater the number of different mental disorders they seem to possess. However, the right wing on this bird is trying to flap very hard and fast to keep the bird in the air; extremists are shed like feathers as they go. The left wing, on the other hand, has sawed itself from the bird thinking that it can fly where it wants to go without that big clunky bird pushing it around. The left wing has embraced their extremists because without the bird to balance their flight, they need the mass.
FuzzyMarineVet
Level 8
Sep 28, 2022
1
If you told me that the left wing and the right wing were on the same bird, and you were talking politics, I would say you are illiterate at best. You have been duped by the criminal party that still exists because it has convinced you that it makes no difference which party you vote for.
And which party claims that they are not the same because they defend the Constitution, and has rules that punishes members for even the appearance of corruption? Republicans do. Look it up.
Democrats don't, or there would be no Democrats. Which party tells you the other is more corrupt than they are? Democrats.
TimTuolomne
Level 9
Sep 27, 2022
2
The Bird is our country 
Imagine how nice it could be, if we all flapped in the same direction.
@David42 There are Constitutionalists. They are the Republicans. And from the beginning of our nation there have been anti-Constitutionalists. The Southern anti-Constitutionalists would not have signed the Declaration of Independence if the banishment of slavery clause had not been removed, and we would not be the United States of America.
Anti-Constitutionalists became "Democrats." Their name and their original mantra and everything about them has been a deception from the start so they could surreptitiously challenge the limits of their power, which always was the Constitution.
Democrat heritage is the Southern plantation owners, which always had an image problem. So by 1828 they crafted a platform as the "Party of the common man," which they called the Democrat Party, as if they were philosophically aligned with the principles of the Constitution. Far from it. The Constitution already protected the rights of citizens by limiting government, and that was a problem for Southern plantation owners trying to protect their empires.
Lincoln founded the Republican Party in 1854 as a direct response to the threat to the Constitution in the Democrat Party. The response of the Democrats? They founded the KKK to intimidate former slaves from voting Republican, and when Democrats were suddenly faced with a party of integrity that was going to contrast with their underhandedness so clearly, they had only one option: to slander that party as best they could by blaming the Republicans for every dirty trick the Democrats did. That tradition continues to this day. Most Democrat voters have no idea their party founded the KKK.
So could the nation be without two opposing parties? No. In a free representative republic, it was always going to be those for protection of the rights of citizens, and those seeking power at the expense of citizens.
And if you read the Federalist Papers, it will become clear why we have two parties and not more, why one party can not work, and why we have the Electoral College. All of those things are a direct realistic response to human nature, nothing more.
Extremes of any sort are a concern to those who think independently for themselves. Well said.
SpikeTalon
Level 10
Sep 27, 2022
2
Be part of the movement!
Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.