According to the US Constitution, any land not owned and held in trust by our government in fact belongs to ALL citizens of the USA equally. to use for camping and enjoying nature as long as we do not start a new community, build a perminate structure. now then my question is the BLM and DNR oversee the public domain land as if it is THEIR'S and not ours. putting up 14 day camping limit signs which is unconstitutional. should they be made to stop their over reach???
My Question is why does BLM that is admittedly funded by soro over see this land who also runs cair and other organizations that support muslim migration and to America wich is not a problem the Questions start rolling when you know that Frakken who is also a teacher of and a recruiter for Islam is running BLM and other's with/ for soro. So what is the publicity held land being used for?
in this case BLM does not stand for black lives matter. and is not funded by Soros...
If you have a case to challenge it why not.
I have call the cops on BLM agents in Colorado that were trying to enforce their 14 day rules. when I showed the cops the passage in the constitution that says we can enjoy public domain land indefenately... the cops then told the BLM agents they would be arrested if they continued to harrass me. for the next 2 1/2 months BLM glared out the window at me as they drove by my campsite.... moral of the story is KNOW the constitution and carry a pocket copy everywhere you go...some cops can read and comprehend english after all...