"...many right-wingers tell each other that the near-consensus among scientists on human-caused climate change is a conspiracy among politically correct academics who are committed to a government takeover of the economy. This is sheer nonsense, but it can gain traction when the noisiest voices in the academy are the repressive fanatics.."
No. The view climate change is a conspiracy is not nonsense. Consider the leaked CRU email scandal a few years ago. They revealed the ruthless way these academics have been determined to silence any expert questioning of the findings they have arrived at by such dubious methods – not just by refusing to disclose their basic data but by discrediting and freezing out any scientific journal which dares to publish their critics' work. It seems they are prepared to stop at nothing to stifle scientific debate in this way, not least by ensuring that no dissenting research should find its way into the pages of IPCC reports.
The "man made climate change" claim causes a bad side effect . People get so worked up over co2 that real, actual pollution is sidelined. This is an interesting link to the beginning of the craze. [heartland.org]
Debating the science is missing the point. The real issue is not the accuracy of climate prediction, but the economics of the solution. I reject the idea that western nations pick up the tab, while the major polluters like China and India pay nothing, and in some instances, get subsidies, all the while continuing to build coal fired plants. People who opposed the validity of the economics are routinely and falsely tagged as “climate deniers”. The US didn’t abandon Paris because it denies science. It walked away because Paris was offering an economic based response. Ironically, the US walked away and now it’s emissions are declining.