So evolution is a fact and evolution is an explanation for it?

I'm not sure if that's circular logic or a self-referencing definition, but it definitely sounds wrong to me.

Low resolution answer:
Scientific Laws have a mathematical formula, are proven and high consistent (F = G × [(m1m2)/r2]) etc...

Scientific Theories are observable and repeatable by different people (gravity, evolution)

A Hypothesis may or may not be true and requires rigorous testing and not just a flimsy one-off to prove what you want.

Psychological theories are sometimes observable and/or falsifiable and sometimes political and voted on and enforced through government and quasi-government bodies. (Many conditions have no quantifiable tests, they are simply check boxes and or correlation of self-reflection that may or may not be accurate/biased)

Sociological Theories are narratives and best guesses see also, religion. (Every country thinks their society is the best and that everything before them was different shades of primitive)

I'm genuinely curious, what tests did critical race theory undergo and get proved correct?

Because we sure seem to be pushing the Hell out of that one lately as if it were the gospel truth.

Sorry to get in the way of your Christian bash.

God did do it. Prove evolution. Make life from nothing. Make universe from nothing. Real science is testable. Observable. Theory is not. Evolution is therefore a theory.

Natural Selection is an observed scientific fact.
Evolution is a theory, based on that observation, that maybe that's where new species come from.
It remains unproved, and even still, it does nothing to even suggest where life itself came from.
"God did it" is an attribution for the origin of the process, not a competing theory. There's no need for Science worshipers to feel threatened. The assertion is, in fact, irrefutable; since "God" is what we call the originator of all natural Laws and processes. So it's True, by definition.