idw.community

1 2

US politics:

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' decision on large capacity magazines is designed to lead to a Supreme Court review-
[redstate.com]

This stuff does not happen by accident, as there sometimes is a design and purpose behind the crafting of legal arguments in an appellate decision. Today’s decision from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals invalidating a California law banning “large capacity magazines” (LCMs) — magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition — was crafted by the author for the purpose of increase the likelihood that the Supreme Court will take the case up and issue some clarifying principles with regard to limitations on Second Amendment rights imposed by state legislatures.

SpikeTalon 9 Aug 15
Share

Post a comment Author often replies/likes Reply Author often replies/likes Add Photo

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

4

I get to carry them anyway, but I think the restrictions are unconstitutional and would like to see the question decided.

Same here.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:122734
IDW.community does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.